Election Fever in Canada?

March 17th, 2011 Thomasso

For a guy who likes telling Canadians that he does not want one, our Prime Minister is sure pulling out all the stops to create one. Now that he has proven that his government has misled his people, and will continue to mislead, his confidence has hit the floor with many people that I know of, including myself. Hey, turn on the television and watch the political ads from all parties.

I am not too particular about having to listen to the election commercials and fake promises that each party will spew out if an election is called. I guess it is a necessary evil for a democracy to work and function, but I do believe that this government has worn its welcome and Canada needs to move forward. Deep down inside I want change. I believe Canada needs change, but I want change that I can trust.

My problem is that none of the parties could possibly produce the magic pill that will fix the country overnight. Of course, I know that this is not possible, fixing the country overnight, but I am sure those claims will be made that will say that we will be in worse trouble if we elect the wrong government. Each party seems to tout itself as the government in waiting to rescue us from damnation.

I do not agree with most of what this government has done. The best example I can think of are the several Crime Bills that are before the House of Commons. Here, Canadians wanted tough on crime legislation because everyone believes that crime has gotten out of control. Many people believe that criminals have more rights than they do, the victim. The mandate of this government has been to play on that fear, and play the “crime card,” as some call it. So voters said, enough is enough and voted accordingly. Sadly, what these voters wanted too was a responsible government who was also going to lower their taxes and pave the road to economic prosperity. What the government has not told the voters outright is that tough on crime legislation is very expensive, and yes, your taxes are going to increase to pay for it.

I do not see the public as embracing as they aught to be when it comes to voting. I know that voter apathy will be high, and voter turnout will be low. This is the state that we live in to day. As much as I want people to go out and vote, I also understand the unwillingness to do so. But, like it or not, I believe in the democratic process, and I am damn thankful that I live in one as opposed to what else is available around the world. So I will go out vote because that is the right thing to do.

Will I be happy?

Well, that remains to be seen. Maybe the spring election will inject some life into this dismal economic climate that we are in right now?

Posted in Criminal Law, Criminology, Diatribe, General, Socail Media, Social economics, Social Justice | 1 Comment »

Frustration: Cold Cuts and Mysteryville

March 8th, 2011 Thomasso

I have been going like mad, jumping through hoops, and bending myself, to fit the needs of others in the world of my new career path. At 1:00pm today that little world suddenly closed up, and within the time it took to press the Enter key, that door shut. I had been working on some contract work within the scope of setting up a project in the form of rehabilitation programs for inmates who would seek special permission to enter this project, and we would offer counselling.

Just a note here: I have to be vague about this contract becuase of the nature of its content. I know it sounds like I am talking in riddles and circles, but I have to. The goals are still the same and direction is still moving forward, but competition is huge, and I will not let the team down. Plus, I need to start making some serious money here!

Like all efforts through government and private venture, the money holder want guarantees, fitting their ideology and needs, and yet the flexibility to meet the market demands. Cost seems to be the sticking point. And oddly enough, it was not the high or low end of the money scale that was the issue, it was the “happy” scale that seemed to matter. Let me clarify some more here. You have to spend the prescribe amount of money to make the world of the bureaucratic agency happy. Due to some weird rule in the accounting department, there is a scale that is posted, and everything must fit nicely into that. The only problem is that they do not share that information.

So, if we were to volunteer our services, then the bureaucratic agency would not have the effective control that they desire, as part of that check and balance issue that gets tossed around many times over. So spending the money means having some sort of leverage over the third party, or group in lieu of services. If you ask for too much money in your budget, then you are simply over priced and no longer fit the mandate of that agency. So where is the middle, happy, ground?

Well, I have not found it—yet.

So, I am frustrated at this point in time. Myself, and the rest of my team have decided not to wait out the  April 15th deadline and have already started onto other projects. We have also put the word to our other colleagues as to our dismal performance with this project, and have posted numerous warnings and questions on the forum website that we use.  I read the forum too, and have seen other patterns, with other groups, who have gone through similar problems that we have experienced.

I may have to consider relocating to another province if I am to continue with on my career path. British Columbia seems to be over saturated, and lowering its standards based on the facts and figures that I have right now. If too many practitioners are released into the workforce, then their value drops, but if they all relocate, then the talent drains away from the source into other markets, and market place stagnates.

Sustainability on my part is my immediate concern, as somewhere in there I need to make a living too.

Posted in Bitching about work, Criminal Law, Criminology, Diatribe, General, Law, Social economics, Social Justice | Comments Off

A Duty to Act

January 8th, 2011 Thomasso

This is an Auto-Post made on December 12, 2010, posted automatically as I prearranged this on January 4th, 2011. You are still welcomed to post comments.

Below, is a re-edited page from my personal journal back in the early 1990′s, one of the most scariest times I encountered while living up in Prince Rupert. I read this again back on September 2010 when I was going through my old journals, so that I could dig some material up for a paper I was writing in class. I needed some ideas of personal accounts for one particular writing exercise. I came across this little gem.

Below is a true story of  when I was living on my own in a townhouse complex. I kept a lot of the details out of it, for obvious reasons, but for the sense of it, the remaining details are very close to the real experience and state of mind at that time.

My purpose of writing this is based on that ethical dilemma of acting versus non-acting when someone is in pain and needs help; when should one intervene or exercise apathy. Far to often we read stories of how victims are ignored while they cry for help. This is a cry to those people who were left for dead as passer-by carried on their daily activities because they did not wish to get involved whether out of fear or selfishness.

I should also point out that there is a huge difference between coming to one’s aid, to rescue them, and reporting the incident to the authorities. The basic rule is, if your life is in jeopardy, keep away, but report it to the police as soon as you can. There is no law that says you must sacrifice, or risk, your life to help another in Canada.

On the other side, people seem to think that if it is in someone elses home, across the street, than it is none of your business. Sadly, ethics can be diminished when you hide behind your curtains of your living-rooms.

In this story I took the initiative and made that phone call. The result was a criminal conviction. The woman did go to the hospital with several abrasions to her head and right arm, but she did recover. Shockingly, she did go back to the home, and sadly, another incident did occur after I had moved away. She did move again, and as far as I know, she has not been seen since.

November 13 1990: I heard a dull loud sound that seemed to have occurred right by my bedroom window. It woke me, so I sat up and turned on my light by the bed and wondered what the could have been. I peaked out through the window blinds to see if I could spot anything unusual, but nothing looked out of place in the darkness. I shrugged it off, turned off my light, and wrapped myself up with my covers.

A few seconds had passed before I heard the loud voices of two people yelling. It was clear that there there was one male and one female voice, and that there were engaged in a very heated argument. I sat up in bed, and rethought about what was going on. Hesitantly I put on my slippers and went into the living room where I sat on my recliner and looked out through the window, to see which neighbour it was making all the noise. It was my next door neighbour right beside me. They were clearly having a fight, and the topic of the fight, I could hear very clearly, was about money.

Several seconds went by, while I sat there starring blankly into space, when the sound of a door slammed opened. Then the voices become vividly clearer as they moved out onto the lawn right by my window. As they yelled back and forth, I turned on my lights inside, hoping that that would scare them back inside where they could make less noise. The tactic did not work. She was half dressed and he was still in his work clothes. Then the sound of a fist hitting flesh, with a distinct howl of pain, and the ruffling sounds of feet dragging across the gravel driveway, could be heard, clear as day.

Her blood curdling sound of pain I am sure must have woke the entire neighbourhood up, but it did not. No one was up? I could see not one light on from the other homes on the street.

She screamed back at him and ran back inside, but not before he grabbed door and forced himself back inside after her.

Now I witnessed an assault.

The screaming kept up for another few minutes. In that time I grabbed my phone and dialled 9-1-1. I explained to the operator what I had seen, and that the women could be still in danger she and her spouse went back inside the house. They were still fighting when the police arrived.

Two officers came up to the house. One officer knocked on the door while another waited by the rear of the house. No one answered the door. Then a second set of knocks, but this time it was followed with, “this is the police, there has been a complaint, I need to talk to you.” No Reply.

Then I heard some screams from the woman, then a loud crashing sound—the door getting kicked in, then silence.

About fifteen minutes later another police car arrived, and I heard the man being escorted away from the house.

In the end, it is easy to say that what I did was the right thing to do. At the time, I was young and lacked the experience and knowledge that I have today. However, the basic instinct of watching someone in pain, crying for help, is a very real emotion, and one that we should always act upon. Personal danger is perhaps the great determinator as we also have to balance whether or not we should get involved.

Would our personal safety be an issue when dealing with an domestic dispute with our neighbour? This is the question when dealing with violence of whether to get involved or not. However, there is a duty of care with our neighbour, as a neighbour, to honour them when issues of criminality come to play. This means that when you witness a criminal act, you must act, and proceed accordingly by reporting it to the Crown, i.e., the police. Personal safety must come first, but justice must prevail. Let the police do their job, and you can keep your anonymity.

Posted in Criminal Law, Criminology, General, Social Justice | Comments Off

Armchair Academics of BS

November 7th, 2010 Thomasso

I love it when someone tells that you “don’t need four years of University to figure out how law works” or, “Yea, I got it figured out, I don’t need your help, we don’t need all that complicated stuff.” Even more so, are the people who base their entire state of reasoning on a belief or, what they heard from a political ad – these are my favourites.

The reason why I am writing this out today is because I was ask to fill in at one of the halfway houses in the lower mainland. (I am withholding the name of the facility for obvious reasons.)  I was given the opportunity only because of my qualifications and merits, e.g., education, experience and *gender. This did not sit well some of the other staff members who have worked at the facility for a number of years. They complained to their duty officer as I walked in and started working.

The issue is that the government as placed very high standards on who is responsible for inmates at correction facilities, and those standards are set very high. Entry level positions are almost impossible for someone who is walking in off of the street with no formal education, training and security clearance. Getting into the higher, more specialized positions requires years of formal education and training, as in my case, even before you can have face to face contact with inmates at this level.

The fill-in duties that I did were assisting with counselling, and providing support and evaluations, for a program that deals with high-risk offenders. Believe me, you cannot just walk in from off of the street and start this job. My six years in University just only begins to cover what I needed as far as knowledge, experience and my background when dealing with the array of situations that go on from one minute to the next in this facility. I was on my toes for the whole entire time. Fortunately it is mostly routine, well for me, as most of what needed to be done is highly formalized and laid out in regulation and policy.

To the armchair academic, I pointed out that is it a criminal offence to fake your credentials in  positions that are appointed under law that carry out legal and public functions under law for the public good and service. If a position says that you must have formal education to perform these duties, then a process of checks and balances are undertaken to make sure that you are qualified and meet the requirements for that position. The reasoning for having all of this formal education, as I mentioned previously, is to become qualified in accordance to standards set out by its administrators. It is they who set the benchmark for duties performed, not collective of the labourers who set out with their daily duties and functions. If a person wishes to embark into the upper echelon of employment, then that person must pay the price (both in time and money, and pass the exams) to advance them self up into it.

*it is difficult, but not impossible, for women to work in all male persons as there are some duties that prohibit women from performing.

Tom, very soon to be B.A. in Criminology.

Posted in Bitching about work, Criminal Law, Criminology, Diatribe, General, University classes | Comments Off

Contradictions of High Expectations

October 21st, 2010 Thomasso

This post has taken me a while longer to conjure up than it would have normally in similar situations, but the lack of sleep has taken its toll on me and whenever I get the chance, I dive into bed for some high impact snoozing. So hang in there with me as I try and sort out my thoughts on this one.

The news has attracted me to two outstanding court cases that took place this week. First, the sentencing of Col. Russell Williams, for what could be said as Canada’s most horrific criminal case in modern memory as he Pleaded guilty to a total of 86 counts, two of which were first degree murder of women that he sexually assaulted and tortured to death. Secondly was the case of B.C., Rail, or the Basi-Virk trial, where corruption charges were laid and the two men pleaded guilty in Vancouver on Monday.

What is fascinating for me, as a Criminologist, is that one case was almost given total and exclusive media coverage, with the blessing of the court, mainly the Crown, while the other was done so discreetly, that no one will ever know just how far the corruption went. In comparing these two trials, I was left with an ago old question that is given to most people who study criminal law, which is, why do we treat these crime do differently? Obliviously, the punishment should fit the crime, and I think many would agree that this as being commonsense, but what if both categories of crimes are so outrageous that they should deserve the same level of treatment by all parties, such as the public’s right to know?

The Col. Russell Williams case we were hurled from the media the horrors that this man did to so many women, and the court felt that all Canadians should hear these accounts, no matter how graphic they are. Yes, everything that this man did were so outrageous that many probably could not watch, listen or read as each bloody graphic detail was spewed out through the media. The reasoning was, according to the Crown prosecution, was that this information needed to come out so that when, in twenty-five years Mr. Williams is eligible for parole, these accounts can be replayed and the court at that time will have full understanding just how vile his crimes were.

The Basi-Virk case, these two men pleaded guilty, but in their situation the court was closed in the sense that what really happened was not given to the public through the media. We will never know just how much wrong doing took place at the government level. For the government of today, they would like this to be quickly forgotten, especially with all the negative publicity so far this year. I agree with most who argue that of all the cases before the courts, this one should have had the public in mind. Sure, we could have a public enquiry, but I doubt that this will happen.

Remember that in both of these cases, millions of tax payer dollars was spent, and both cases, guilty please were given. One was semitransparent, while the other was almost blanked out.

I wish I had more time write about this.

Posted in Criminal Law, Criminology, General, Law, Law and Order, Social Justice | Comments Off

Typing Time Away

October 18th, 2010 Thomasso

One good thing about writing in this blog is the amount of time that it takes to crank out an entry into it. Sure, some would say that this is a bad thing, while others would argue that it is all in the perspective and context that it is taken in, but I am using it to my advantage. Right now at this very moment I need to burn a couple of hours of time, mainly to take my mind off of the course material that I have been going over repeatedly for the last three days, and also to keep myself awake until 9:00pm so I can get my promised eight hours of sleep I have been planning.  I have a midterm tomorrow, and I need every minute of sleep that I can get for better performance during the exam.

This week will be relatively mild, with just this small midterm schedule for tomorrow, and just regular lectures, but the week following will be another week of exams, with a presentation on the 27th. Presentations are weird because no two profs grade the same, yet everyone that I have seen and been apart of, all seem the same in their basic components. You have the Power Point, from which most just read from it; and then you have the well prepared introduction, list of points, and a small but eloquent closing. Everything can either be squeezed into a five minute spiel, or the presentation could go on for hours. It is different from one group to another in term of preparation and the amount of data used, but they all follow the same pattern.

The Male and Female brain is one of the most fascinating topics I recently got involved with last week. Once in a while you do find yourself immersed into a full blown discussion on or in your field of expertise. How men and women learn was the topic of this one. It was fascinating at the many different points among undergraduates. Some argue that boys, when they are developing, fall into three distinct groups of learning behaviour, where as girls, in the same age group, seen to have four or five. This is all new to me as I never read any of these research case studies they cited, so I would really have to go out and do some serious reading to catch up and be able to participate in this discussion. But I found it intriguing to say the least. Psychology is a very wide field of study, and it could take one up to six years just to graduate from it, and have enough knowledge under your belt to become an expert.

In my field, Criminology, I took some time today to follow a live twitter feed of  Colonel Russell Williams’ court appearance during his deposition hearing, where he plead guilty to all 82 counts of break and entering where he was sealing women’s underwear and taking pictures of himself in the homes of the women he stole the garments form, while wearing those garments, and two murders, and some sexual assaults. He will get automatic life in prison.

What I found profound was that his criminal spree reportedly went back roughly two and a half years before his eventual capture by police. One side effect of criminology is that we automatically try to label and categories criminals, and put them in lists for further examination. We are always looking for that magic pattern.

The benefits of the live twitter feed is that you get to read, in detail, what both the Crown and Defence are saying in almost real time, a you get perspective that you otherwise would not get unless you were actually there. I guess in court you can bring in your Blackberry and type away. I know that you cannot record the audio, or take photographs. But hey, texting is the next best thing.

Tomorrow the hearing continues.

Well, I still have some time left, so I may do some cleaning then off to bed. Talk to you all later!

Posted in Criminal Law, Criminology, Diatribe, General, Homework and deadlines, Law, Social Justice, University classes | Comments Off

An Eye In My Car

September 25th, 2010 Thomasso

The first time I saw cameras in a car was the RCMP’s bait car program that started in Surrey, BC a number of years. Since then I have started seeing the cameras in lamp standards and traffic-light poles, and in people’s homes too. Not surprisingly, cameras are becoming a regular facet of our lives as theft has become such a regular occurrence that calling the police about is, well, is a waste of time. Instead we just report it to the police, and hope for the best.

Three weeks ago I saw for the first time a van that had cameras mounted in three locations on the outside of it, and one camera mounted along the dashboard facing the driver. My first impression was, “wow, you got to be kidding?”

Since that day, I have now seen four more vehicles with on-board security cameras systems mounted both on the outside and inside of the vehicle.

You are probably wondering why have them on the  outside of the vehicle? Actually, more specifically, they are inside, but looking through the glass of the windsheild facing outwards. So technically the cameras are all inside.

It was explained to me that in British Columbia so many accents are going through a transitional phase in the law courts right now. With our state run insurance provider called ICBC, damages and fault are being split between both parties om a regular occurrence. One criticism of this is that ICBC appears to be making more money by awarding damages between the parties as oppose to just finding one person at fault. It was also explained to me that the victim would have to embark on a very intents period of litigation that would last of upwards to a decade before justice was served, and the risk of still being a victim even further is always a huge possibility. With both parties now having to pay higher premiums on their insurance, the insurance provider, ICBC, is the only party that wins.

Cameras are starting to paint a very different picture now on our roads. People tend to not tell the truth about their negligence, and sadly, some getaway with more than just a free accident from ICBC, they may also walk away without any criminal charges too. Now, if a camera sees them in their moment of negligence, well, it would seem likely that it would make the case more difficult for the law courts to ignore this as evidence? Only time will tell.

So, vehicle mounted cameras are popping up everywhere now. Not just for security, but for peace of mind when someone causes an accident. This would also mean that if you caused the accident, your camera could also spell doom for your insurance and your liability too. And if you steal a vehicle, or its contents, you maybe on candid camera. Peek-a-boo!

Posted in Criminal Law, Criminology, General, Law and Order, Social economics, Social Justice | Comments Off

Stopping an Idea with Rent-a-Cops: A Warrning About Freedom of Speech

July 31st, 2010 Thomasso

Last Thursday I saw something that embarrassed me while I was sitting in my CRIM4301 class, a class on Human Rights. A fellow classmate who was supposed to be in the class with us was hurriedly walking past the classroom with two campus rent-a-cops in tow.   We all jumped up looked out the window from our second story view point when one of the students notice that he was outside in the parking lot being lured off of the campus grounds by four rent-a-cops, or campus security guards.

Why was this all happening? Emery Warner, who is also a student of Criminology, was doing a project similar to a project that I am doing in my Communications class, where he is brining to the attention of the students. facts and issues about the new company, Sodexo, who had just started taking over the cafeteria on all Kwantlen campuses. The issues range from Sodexo’s past and present job practises, and the quality of food they serve, not to mention the way they treat their employees.

Anyway, please read the on-line copy of the story that was posted in today’s Vancouver Sun news paper about Emery’s ordeal.

Kwantlen student cooks up a storm over cafeteria operators: Emery Warner says security guards barred him from campus for handing out protest pamphlets.

Posted in Criminal Law, Criminology, Diatribe, Events, General, Law and Order, Social Justice, University classes | 1 Comment »

That’s Right, a New Laptop.

June 18th, 2010 Thomasso

I am happily typing on my brand new laptop that I just bought today. Since the death of my old laptop three weeks ago, life has been rough trying to cope without one. I have really adapted myself to using my notebook when attending lectures and other events where I need to take huge amounts of notes. I find that I can type faster than I can by pitting pen to paper, the old school method. So this is the test run with the new machine.

A note on driving in Langley City. I have to applaud the RCMP for their enormous effort when they did the police state traffic blitz last week. That was great. That was a rare time to have everyone driving the proper speed, driving defensively, and not having to worry about being cut-off. I was beautiful! I really think that if this is what it takes to get people to drive safely, then I have no problems with the police state deal in Langley. I like it when I see speeders, tailgaters and red-light-runners get nailed!

Summer, could it finally be here? Doesn’t it start officially Monday?

Human rights: in my fourth year class this term, we are studying the topic of human rights from many different perspectives. My group presentation will be in three weeks, and out topic will be international criminal courts and law. When I first started looking at the option that I have for information on this topic, I thought that I would be struggling to find information and sources, but as it turns out, there is no shortage if texts on the topic. Heck, just in terms of current events from the news there is so much going on around the world that I can hardly keep up with it all. Right now we are focusing on the Gaza Blockade by Israel, and the G20 summit in Toronto. I am finding tones of stuff to write about. I think we will have a fun presentation. I’m looking forward to.

Next week’s class we will be having a mock court, and we will be arguing about a heated debate  on whether women should have to wear the veil/scarf aka Hijab. I will be playing the roll as one of the Crown prosecutors, of which I must come up with an argument to that will hold up against the Chart of Rights and Freedoms (1982) in Canada and state why women who choose to cover their heads should not be allowed in certain circumstance under Canadian jurisdiction. I think I got my work cut out for me.

My business Communications and technical writing class: My last class was dedicated to the topic of BS, or Bull Shit, from which we explored several ways that people can lie, spin or not tell the truth. The humour was gone when we got into the nitty-gritty aspects of how much of it there is in the world today. Oddly enough politics was not the worst bunch, but businesses and marketers took the top spot! I know, it was a shock for me too!

Well the lap top seems to have passed the first test. I can connect through wi-fi on campus, type out a doc, and upload it to the blog. I think we are all good here now. Talk to you later, gater.

Posted in Criminal Law, Criminology, Diatribe, General, Homework and deadlines, Humour, University classes | Comments Off

Human Rights Maybe Low on the Priority of Some

May 29th, 2010 Thomasso

OK, a little back grounder on for my thoughts on human rights, and why we wave the banner around but no one does anything about it. I am taking this course, as part of my degree in Criminology, and it deals specificity with all subject matter under the umbrella of human rights. We will cover, once the course is completed, everything from domestic and local issues, all the way up to international and global issues that concerns us today, and from the past. The mesh of political views, to cultural dynamics, are the themes that are a constant so far in this course. But this course is more than covering current events, and history texts, it is all about the ideas and solutions that could change the world in the near future.

War is a nasty business, right? When we talk about human rights, it is usually in the shadow of war. Ware is when man kind is at its worse. War teaches that all rules can be thrown out, or ignored, and these times of conflict bring the opportunity of creating exceptions to the rules of human rights, circumventing them in order to wreck complete havoc towards the enemy. However, when the conflict is over, and the wounds begin to heal, the world cries out for accountability, so the Untied National was born, and later on, the World Criminal Court. Venues that try to convict those people who started these terrible things that they did during those conflicts, and hold them to accountability. But the system is weak and, yes, it is very politely motivated.

Sovereignty (hey, I got the “g” in the right spot) is the key issue when thinking globally.  Would we ever consider the UN police marching down the streets of Washington D.C., poised to arrest President George W. Bush for possible war crimes? No way because the U.S. Would not tolerate it, and they have the means of making sure they are in total control of their sovereignty, not the U.N.. It is not the U.N.’s place to do this anyway. But for a class debate, this makes for some very interesting lectures. What right does a nation have for sending in it’s “special” forces to capture and detain a suspect of war crimes inside another country? I can write about this for hours…

In my class, there is a great mix of students from just about every walk of life from around the glob. We have students from just about all of the major organized religions, and about five students who are from the Middle Eastern areas, including Israel. Last week’s class lecture was the best yet. Although the principles of human rights seems obvious, the world that we live in is far to complicated to have every nation adopt in its laws these basic tenants. However, having such a diverse class means that the discussions are as diverse too, so when discussions start tackling issues such as international human rights laws, the brain power really start to crank up among the students.

I am look forward to next class. I think as we dive deeper into the murky world of human rights, my level of enlightenment will also increase.

Sadly, this will be my official last class of Criminology. I only have two courses after this, and they are electives. I will miss these classes after I graduate.

Posted in Criminal Law, Criminology, Diatribe, General, Law, Law and Order, Social Justice, University classes | Comments Off